Here's Your Warning

This article, read aloud:

Share: X · Facebook · LinkedIn · Reddit · Bluesky · Threads · Email

I woke up Monday morning and watched BeardMeatsFood's weekly Sunday food-challenge video. Then John Oliver's new segment surfaced on my YouTube For You page, on my iPad: an entire episode on the rising prominence of extremist beliefs within the Republican Party. I stumbled into it cold—no radar, nothing prepared. The posts came as I watched: this story might have worked last year but—Nazi please! As I write this, I am twenty-five minutes and nineteen seconds into a thirty-six-minute show, and I'm still not through with it. What Oliver thinks he did is quarantine: drag the crazies into the light, read their wildest lines aloud, let the audience laugh, send everybody home inoculated. What he actually did is platforming—and platforming is not quarantine; platforming is distribution. The lie is the label: he sold distribution as containment. You cannot cartoonize a man who refuses to be cartoonized, and Nick Fuentes refuses.

Here is the mechanism, because a warning without a mechanism is just a mood. The segment names Fuentes and the rest of the extremist talkers—streamers, podcasters, the whole circuit—on HBO, in front of a large audience, and some of them will now go and check the men out. But nobody they find there is going to radicalize them, because that is not how this works. Fuentes does not make converts; he makes roll call. A voice like his stands in the schoolyard and hollers Olly Olly oxen free—come out, come out, wherever you are—to people already hiding, already primed, already waiting for somebody loud to say the coast is clear. Oliver should have done this eighteen months or two years ago; now everybody is extremism curious, everybody is choosing sides, and none of it is in the center—the proverbial horse is out of the proverbial barn. In October of 2026 the segment is promotion of the very thing it castigates, and its host is, in the classic phrase, a useful idiot. He believes the framing is the vaccine. But inoculation requires a dead virus, and not all dead virus is dead—and anyway, a virus is the wrong metaphor: you cannot inoculate anybody against a summons, a call going out to people who have been waiting in the trees to hear it. And Oliver thinks the game is about the caller—mock the caller, quarantine the caller—when the caller is the least of it. You cannot put the toothpaste back in the tube, and don't look over there, look how crazy they are only makes the hiding place more attractive.

And here is the question Oliver never asks, the one I posted that same morning: why doesn't he talk about how extreme right-wing popularity is a direct response to extreme left-wing popularity, and that they feed off of each other? Each pole's popularity is the other pole's recruiting sergeant: every outrage on one side is fundraising, recruitment, and permission for the other. And both sides are, strangely and tellingly, anti-Zionist and anti-semitic. The poles share more now than they used to, because both have become the same substance: populism, built on a populist base—and populism is a predisposition before it is a position. It needs somebody standing in the way, and the somebody rotates: capitalists for one crowd, the undocumented and the H-1B engineers for another, Christians or Muslims or Christian nationalists for a third—and always, eventually, the Jews. People glom onto whichever other is on offer; the need is the constant, the target a costume. Twenty percent on one side, twenty percent on the other—and no matter what either twenty believes, it is the sixty percent in the middle who have all the momentum now, and they are all populists. All of them, and yes, "all" is hyperbole. The direction underneath it is not: Oliver is mocking the fringe on behalf of an audience that no longer sits where he thinks it sits.

Now my own flag, planted where nobody can mistake it: everybody should be platformed. Everybody. I do not believe in censorship, and I do not want Nick Fuentes banned from anything—he should be on X, on Threads, on Facebook, everywhere, and so should Alex Jones, and so should Tucker Carlson. Not because I endorse a word of it; because a free country does not get to memory-hole the voices its own people are primed to hear. The honest work is harder: let them all talk, and tell the truth about why the talking works.

Listen, too, to what the mockery traffics in. Oliver read aloud, for laughs, the craziest things his featured extremists were saying about Jewish people, and that laughter is supposed to be the end of it. It is a starting gun. It announces that the old explanation can be said out loud again, with production values—said by the respectable people, on the respectable network, which is its own kind of permission. The caricature that is always ready, always the perfect hand in glove for a scapegoat hunt, is the oldest one in the drawer—the Elders of Zion caricature, the propaganda caricature of Zionism and Judaism as a hidden hand on the world. Named plainly: it is a caricature, it is propaganda, it was a forgery when the tsar's police cooked it up. And for whatever fifty-six years of watching is worth: antisemitism is low-key higher right now than I have ever seen it, and people are ripe for the scapegoat, on the left and on the right.

When I was a kid, this exact material traveled as mimeographed pamphlets about the Elders of Zion and the rest of it, handed out by strange men in typewriter repair businesses alongside their own worn copies of None Dare Call It Conspiracy and The Rockefeller Files, and the believers mostly lived in cabins deep in the woods. Now it is completely mainstream. The belief didn't change; the distribution did—mimeograph and hand-to-hand then, the feed now. The men didn't change either. The internet is full of them, on both poles: Nazis who would tell even me I'm not white enough—not German enough, not English enough—and far-left communists who want the bourgeoisie up against the wall. In an unprimed country they stay what they always were: crackpots, random streamers, Twitch people. The men are constant; the system is the variable. And the old containment play died with the mimeograph: in the fifties and sixties you discredited a man by calling him crazy, and gatekept media enforced the label. Now the stigma doesn't shame anymore; it certifies.

And it is not a white thing, and it is not an American thing. Look at France this month: a student protest over school conditions, layered over in turn by the unions, the ultra-left, banlieue youth, and pure opportunistic looting—every faction pouring itself into the same event, while the National Rally profits without marching a step. In Germany, the AfD is kept from power only by enormous coalition firewall arithmetic, and the European Parliament practices the same sleight-of-hand containment at scale. Canada had its trucker convoys. Central and South America keep electing right populists, country after country. Hungary's new president is exactly like the old president, only a little more European-friendly—which might be a ruse. And at home, the kids are becoming Jesus freaks, a Jesus revolution among the young that polite opinion hasn't even registered. Same water, everywhere, and it has reached the temperature: the perfect conditions for an algae bloom, for black mold. Different countries; different blooms.

I will sit through Oliver castigating the man for a full segment. I will not mainline the castigated man himself. I do not watch Nick Fuentes—not because I am fragile, or fear one viewing would convert me; I am a sober man, and sober men learn exposure discipline. In high school I refused to read the Satanic Bible, not because a chapter would flip me by Friday, but because I had the sense not to make a habit of the thing. It is like exposure to drugs: not dangerous the first or second time; the danger is chronic use. Sit with a voice that charming often enough and your brain starts turning to tapioca. I have thirty years of practice at hearing Coast to Coast AM, Infowars, Corbett, and No Agenda without once answering the call. I have no practice with Fuentes, and neither does anybody my age.

Because the man is genuinely, frighteningly good at this. No college, nothing behind him—no institution, no machine—and he walks into any room in that space the smartest person in it, visibly sharper than Tucker Carlson. Genius-level verbal fluency; he never ums; every word perfectly elocuted and executed; and he is charming as hell, and charm is the one political asset you cannot buy, teach, or fact-check away. Worse, he is a true believer—not a shill, not a grifter. And the superlative, plainly: Nick Fuentes is uniquely dangerous, and I would not say it if it weren't for real teeth and not just a forked tongue. I rank him the most dangerous figure in modern, post-war American history—above George W. Bush, above George H. W. Bush, above Donald Trump, above Ronald Reagan. Presidents are temporary tenants; they wield the system's power for a term and leave the structure standing. His project is the structure's collapse and replacement, pursued with a monk's discipline on a fifty-year horizon.

Do not mistake what he is selling, either: it is not comfort. Fuentes is a warrior monk—celibate, ascetic, an observant traditionalist Catholic of a kind completely normalized in the part of the Church forever threatened with schism. His followers are not being entertained into anything; they are being enlisted by a young man visibly paying costs, who can therefore demand costs. He wants his people to vote Democrat—not from conversion, but arson—so the Republican Party collapses and he can pour his vision into the vacuum. He is uniquely dangerous in exactly the way Charlie Kirk wasn't.

Three lines about the man writing this, for the record, so the warning cannot be misread as sympathy: I am a Zionist; I believe in the right of Israel to exist. I am a Jesus freak. And my true belief belongs to God alone, never to any politics—which is the whole reason I can write this without flinching or joining.

And get the direction of causation right, because people always get it backwards. Nazi leaders do not make Nazi Americans; Americans make Nazi leaders. Trump voters made Trump—Trump did not make Trump voters—and white supremacist voters make white supremacist leaders. Nick Fuentes does not manufacture baby Nicks; he is a manifestation, a boil on the leg of a sick system, and you do not cure the system by lancing the boil and ignoring everything underneath it. The extremism is not in him; it is deep in the sixty percent, and the twenty on the left and the twenty on the right are only exploiting what is already there. Run the control experiment on me: if the whole country suddenly got totally into obscure 1994-era hyperfiction, The Chris Abraham Show would be nationally renowned overnight—and I would not have made hyperfiction fashionable; the people who love it would have made me. I can't make it; people get it wrong.

The forecast, and it is not a bit and not a wish: I am endorsing none of it, and none of it needs my encouragement, and if he is not Kirk'd—if nobody does to him what was done to Charlie—then time, talent, conviction, and charm compound in one direction, and he becomes a major player in American politics. I believe he is a probable future president of the United States. And understand what makes him dangerous: not contamination. He is not a germ, and America is not a wound. He is dangerous as a forecast—the clearest sign yet of what a primed country will summon when it goes looking. And it is going looking. And the forecast runs on both rails, because it has to. I hate to be the both sides guy, but I'm a bothsidist par excellence: in the same way, I think Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is a future American president. But if you'll notice, they're both extremists. An AOC begets a Fuentes, and a Fuentes begets an AOC. Same god, two faces: Hasan Piker is the Janus face of Nick Fuentes, and Fuentes the Janus face of Piker—each the other's favorite exhibit, each feeding the other's flock. The people who refuse to look at a rising force do not make it smaller; they only arrange their own surprise.

I might be wrong. What do I know? I'm a monk living in a studio in sexy South Arlington.

Mark my words. Here's your warning, universe. Here's your warning, Earth. Here's your warning, North America. Here's your warning, America. Here's your warning, Washington, DC.

Share: X · Facebook · LinkedIn · Reddit · Bluesky · Threads · Email