Why Would Anyone Want It to End?

Share: X · Facebook · LinkedIn · Reddit · Bluesky · Threads · Email

I was watching the new season of The Terminal List—slow, solemn, faithful to Jack Carr's novels and drained of most of what made the first season move—when the plot drifted, the way it does, into intrigue about the war in Ukraine, and the intrigue asked the only honest question in the series. Why would anybody want this war to end? Not why won't it end, the way the diplomats ask it. Why would anybody want it to. Too many people are making an extreme amount of money from this war—before it, during it, and after it—for ending it to be in anybody's interest at all. The show treats that as conspiracy, the kind of thing arranged by men in dark rooms. It is not an arrangement. It is an economy.

Provoked

Scott Horton wrote the prehistory in a book whose title is the whole argument: Provoked. For three decades Washington expanded NATO eastward in the teeth of its own diplomats' warnings, then armed and trained Ukraine into a de facto Western military asset while withholding the Article 5 guarantee that would have made the arrangement honest, and when the predictable explosion came, it was named "unprovoked"—a word chosen the way the sticker is chosen, to end arguments rather than describe events. Say the antecedents out loud—Maidan, the Donbas war, the missile defense sites—and you are a justifier, an apologist, a man excusing an invasion. The word works as a locked door: diplomacy behind it, the crusade in front of it. A war that cannot be discussed cannot be negotiated, and a war that cannot be negotiated can only be supplied. Which brings us to the money.

Before, during, after

Run the money in the order it arrives. Before: decades of development contracts—exquisite systems designed in PowerPoint and validated in simulation, billions spent on weapons whose only confirmed kill was a procurement budget. During: the hundred largest arms companies on earth took in $679 billion in 2024, the highest figure SIPRI has ever recorded—$334 billion of it American, European revenues up 13 percent in a single year—while the oil supermajors harvested the price shock, the Gulf states sold replacement barrels at wartime premiums, and Turkey built a middleman's empire, selling Baykar drones to Kyiv with one hand and running parallel imports into sanctioned Russia with the other. Palantir's targeting software, Microsoft's cloud, Starlink's constellation: the war is also a subscription business. After: the World Bank's latest assessment prices Ukraine's reconstruction at $588 billion over ten years—nearly three times the country's entire GDP—and the asset managers and contractors are already positioning for it, the way developers buy land beside an announced highway. Peace, announced tomorrow, strands all three revenue streams at once. War services every one of them. Draw your own diagram of the incentives. It is not a complicated diagram.

The laboratory

Ukraine is the first peer industrial war of the century, which makes it the most valuable research facility on the planet—a live-fire laboratory where the tuition is paid in other people's sons. Its first lesson was the death of the PowerPoint weapon. Systems that were flawless in simulation met Russian electronic warfare and went stupid, GPS-guided munitions jammed into expensive lawn darts, while anything that could be patched survived: software written in bunkers and pushed to the front in hours, in an industry that used to measure update cycles in decades. A $500 FPV drone built from commercial parts kills a $5 million tank, and every armor designer on earth is redoing the math. Ukraine's GIS Arta system assigns artillery targets to the nearest available gun the way Uber dispatches cars. Verified kills earn units ePoints, and ePoints are spent in an online marketplace on better kit—which is to say, the war now has a loyalty program. Palantir says its software does much of the targeting, and its models are training on the largest dataset of real modern war ever assembled. Every month the war continues, the data compounds. Laboratories do not volunteer to close mid-experiment.

The sticker

Walk the floor at Eurosatory in Paris, AUSA in Washington, DSEI in London, and you will find the industry's new gold standard printed on the booths: Combat Proven in Ukraine. It is barely even marketing anymore; it is certification. Ukraine's own defense-tech cluster, Brave1, runs an annual competition literally called Battle Proven—held at Defense Tech Valley in Lviv, seven thousand attendees from fifty countries, categories named Trail Blazers, Game Changers, and Power Players. A war with a trade show. A trade show with a war. The sticker works as a binary filter in every procurement meeting on earth: if your drone cannot survive Ukrainian jamming, the meeting is over; if it killed something in the east and you can show the data, your order book fills for a decade. What used to be whispered in Pentagon corridors is now printed on the lanyard. The pretense is gone, and honestly, the pretense was the only part of the arrangement that ever cost anybody anything.

The bargain

Underneath the profits sits the coldest line in the ledger, the one no booth will ever print. The United States and its allies are dismantling the military of a nuclear-armed rival—the arsenal Washington spent seventy years fearing—at a cost of zero American combat deaths. Not few. Zero. The dying is outsourced entirely, and it is done, on both sides of the line, by men who believe. The Ukrainian soldier is fighting a genuine war of national survival, for his home and his family's existence, and he is right to. The Russian soldier has been handed an existential story by his state—NATO at the throat, the West coming over the hill—and he believes it the way soldiers have always believed it. Neither belief is fake. Both are harvested. Sincere survival on one side, sincere dread on the other, and between them a grinder whose operating costs are billed to Western treasuries as aid and booked in Western boardrooms as revenue. It is the most efficient great-power war ever purchased: the rival bleeds, the laboratory learns, the sticker appreciates, and the buyers' sons come home from college on weekends.

Who pays

Now the other ledger, because the money map has a pattern and the pattern is distance. Ukraine went into this war as one of Europe's poorest countries and has absorbed $195 billion in direct physical damage, with more than sixty percent of its national budget now going to defense and the whole economy kept alive on transfusions from abroad. Russia's war economy posts wonderful revenues on paper, every ruble of it drawn out of the sovereign wealth fund—the Kremlin burning the national savings to simulate prosperity at gunpoint. Egypt, one of the world's great wheat importers, got inflation and a currency crisis out of the grain blockade. Syria got the same bill with nothing to pay it with. The closer you stand to this war, the worse it pays. The farther away you stand—behind a booth in Paris, behind a trading desk, behind a constellation—the better the margins get. The war is a furnace that heats every house except the ones it is burning down.

Television needs conspirators in dark rooms, deciding in whispers that the war must go on. Reality is more efficient and much less cinematic.

Nobody has to conspire. The contracts conspire. Call it a business plan and you flatter it: plans have authors, and authors can be blamed. This has no author. It is a market, and a market never has to meet in a dark room, because it never has to meet at all. The order books conspire. The reconstruction funds, the data, the sticker, the subscription renewals—they all point the same way, and every one of them pays better than peace pays anybody. Wars in the history books end when the argument is settled. Wars in the real world end when the money stops, and this one's money arrives before, during, and after, in three installments, each one larger than the last. Peace is the only product at the expo without a sales team.

Disclosure, since this piece is about who gets paid: the Amazon links above carry my affiliate tag (gerris-20), and as an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. My cut of the war economy runs to a few cents a book, and unlike the order books, it stops the moment you stop clicking.

Share: X · Facebook · LinkedIn · Reddit · Bluesky · Threads · Email